Showing posts with label fairfax county. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fairfax county. Show all posts

Saturday, June 18, 2011

It's Summertime! Feelin' the Need to Get Away?

Ahhhh! Summer is upon us.  Time to head for the hills?  Chillax on the lake?  Smell the salt air and listen to ocean waves?  No matter your style, remember that vacationing requires you make a real estate decision.  This isn't just activities here, you gotta stay somewhere.  Sure, you may choose a hotel, but if you have a  family or a group of more than two, a house or condo will likely offer you better accomodations for less.

For my friends and clients, I want you to remember that I am here to help with ALL your real estate needs....this means your vacation needs, too!

Did you know that...

You can find vacation rentals on my web site... anywhere in the DC Metro area, including, but not limited to Ocean City Maryland! (Our closest beach makes a great getaway, and we really enjoyed Sunset Island when we rented a condo there.)

Just click on the Property Search option.


I have a client that specializes in building riverside cottages and mountainside chalets about an hour from here - about half our sales are weekend getaway homes for people who reside in Loudoun, Fairfax or elsewhere in the DC Metro area.



I have connections to REALTORS all over, many of which specialize in vacation rentals or the sales of vacation homes. So send me an email and tell me your favorite vacation spot, and I will happily connect you to someone who can help you.  For Spring break this year, my family spent 10 days in sunny Orlando in a fabulous three bedroom, three bath, two level townhome for about $1000....minutes from Disney. That's a steal and if you ever want to take advantage of the same deal, all you have to do is ask.  The owner is a friend of mine, and a REALTOR/Broker in the Central Florida area.

Please remember... when you have a real estate need, ANY real estate need, I have real estate solutions!  You'd be surprised at the resources I have at my disposal....and I really do want to be your one stop real estate resource.  (Plus, I might want to stow away in your suitcase.)  :D 

Friday, June 17, 2011

Challenging Your Real Estate Assessment Gets Easier

Aha! An interesting little legal change going into effect July 1 (which will impact local real estate tax assessments beginning Jan 1 of next year):  The burden of proof in Assessment Appeals will be lower. 

After January 1st, localities will have specific burdens to provide you with evidence of their reason for reassessment of your VA properties.  Further, if you appeal an assessment you no longer have to provide "clear and convincing" evidence (80%+ convincing) of a lower valuation... you only need to provide a "preponderance" of evidence (51% convincing). 

If you've ever challenged your assessment you probably know it wasn't too terribly hard to get it changed.  But, now it's going to be even easier. 

Wow.  I have to wonder how this will impact our overall county budgets.  I guess we'll have to stay tuned.  In the meantime, if you'd like to keep tabs on the market in your neighborhood, check out this great web site.  You can order an automated monthly report showing you sales in YOUR neighborhood. 


Interested in staying up on news like this that affects us all?  Join my Facebook page:



Thursday, April 14, 2011

Real Estate Tax Exemption for Disabled Vets (Virginia)


Real estate taxes in Fairfax and Loudoun are pretty high, but we get some great stuff in return - benefits I don't mind paying for. That's probably what our Vets here thought, too... until they became disabled. With less income, it becomes much more of a burden to pay for all of that infrastructure. And now they can get a pass!

Virginia voters authorized a new real estate tax exemption last November. The legislation provides for an exemption from county real estate taxes on the principal dwelling and up to three acres for veterans with a 100 percent service-connected, total and permanent disability. Persons desiring the exemption are required to file the necessary form and provide qualifying documentation. This exemption is also extended to the veteran’s surviving spouse, so long as the death of the veteran occurred on or after January 1, 2011, the real property is maintained as the survivor’s principal residence, and he or she does not remarry.

If your home is in Fairfax, go to this web site for more information and forms: http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/dta/realestatetax_disabledveterans.htm

If your home is in Loudoun, you can apply by going to www.loudoun.gov/taxrelief-forms, by calling the Commissioner’s Office at 703-737-8557, or in the Commissioner’s offices in the County Government Center in Leesburg or the Loudoun Tech Center in Sterling.

In other counties contact your local taxing authority.  Applications should be available throughout the state.
I would just like to take this opportunity, from the bottom of my heart, to thank ALL our Vets for their many sacrifices... sacrifices I am not brave enough to make personally. What would I do without you? You are all HEROS to me. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE.


Sunday, April 3, 2011

Open Houses April 3rd (Ffx & Loudoun)

Check out the list of open houses today...


Fairfax County:

And here is where I will be if you'd like to stop in and say hi!http://matrix.mris.com/Matrix/Public/Portal.aspx?ID=41211487321



This week's open houses brought to you by
703.669.3142

Friday, October 2, 2009

Home Prices Will NOT Return to 2005 Levels

"Home prices will NEVER return to the levels of 2005.  NEVER," said Roger Arnold, a well respected Global macro-economist, during a recent conference call with several Keller Williams Agents in the Northern Virginia area.  Of course, he meant that comment in the context of relative value when you consider affordability indexes (median home price compared to median area income), inflation, etc.

He is not discouraging buying a home today, just "calling it like he sees it" for existing homeowners, himself included (and me, too).  At this point, the artificial home price inflation peaking in 2005 or the beginning of 2006, has pretty much come and gone.  Even in areas where there is still fallout to come, prices are relatively low, and homeownership offers many advantages, financial and otherwise.

Locally, in the Washington DC metropolitan area, we're somewhat insulated from the national economic climate, but we don't go unaffected. 

Since 2006 and 2007, area homeowners thought they would "wait out the storm" by renting their homes for a year or two, rather than selling them, when life forced a move.  It's not that they couldn't sell, just that they wouldn't, because they wanted to get back that 2005 value... and they wanted it very, very much....enough that they couldn't hear what they didn't want to.

Sadly, the next couple of years saw continual price decline.  It caused additional fallout, with even more homeowners letting go of those "second homes" to foreclosure when they realized they simply didn't have the reserves to withstand the storm.  They had drained their savings, and run up credit lines.  Even if their homes were rented, being a landlord turned out to be a much harder job than they thought...and it wasn't making them any money.  The flooding of the housing market with so much similar inventory all at once caused home sales to slow to a crawl, and in some areas to a complete halt.

At this point, our inventory was mostly post foreclosed, bank owned homes (REOs)....and a few traditional sellers who had their homes on the market for about $100,000 above the neighboring REO.  The traditional sellers were being laughed at by buyers, and REALTORs were shaking their heads.  Some agents would even shy away from taking traditional listings entirely.  The REO homes had previously been owned as rental homes by investors; or starter homes by people who had already moved into their next "move up" home without selling their first house; or by people who never should have been buyers in the first place.  Essentially, our market was flooded with an inventory of homes at similar price points, and all in direct competition with one another.  So many choices, and nothing was selling. 

In 2008, desperate to move some houses, banks began holding public, well marketed, auctions.  What they, and the rest of the world, discovered was that prices weren't low enough.  But, when they were, buyers would come out of the wood work.  So, in 2008, even when many thought prices may had already "flattened", Loudoun homes saw a sudden and dramatic 10% price drop in a matter of a few months; and the buying frenzy began. 

Since then, we've seen continual competition for well priced homesREALTORS began to be able to predict market values again since there was some stabilization... at least within that segment of the market.  Perhaps because we could set expectations properly, the same people who did not want to sell their homes in 2006 and 2007 (because they didn't want to give up value) were now ready to sell

Wait!  What was that?  You got it.  A homeowner unwilling to sell in 2007 at $300,000 because they were going to wait until they could sell it for $400,000 again were suddenly willing to sell at $225,000 in 2009?  Yes.  The sellers trying to time the market lost, big time.  In fact, some where now under water, but were willing to face the fact that they could no longer hold on, and started talking about options to foreclosure (i.e. short sales).

With 2009, we've seen more traditional (non-distress, non-bank owned, non-short sale) sales re-emerging in the marketplace, which is what buyers really want.. but inventory remains low.  So, premiums are being placed on these homes, and fierce competition ensues.  Prices are going back up, for all types of sales, but most especially for well cared for homes which are not short sales.  In 2009, we've regained most of the value we lost in 2008. 

But now the greed is re-emerging and it is scaring me.  Sellers, seeing that prices have started to regain value in 2009 are saying that they have new faith that prices will continue to go up, and they seem to think by next year, or the year after, they will be back up to 2005 prices.  No, it's not likely.   I don't think so, and neither does Roger Arnold, or any other REALTOR or economist that I know.

My message here:  Please, don't try to time the market.  If life is suggesting to you it is time to move up, move out, or move on... do it. Sell for what it's worth and make the best of it.  I am talking here, mostly, about principal residences... and telling you that if you didn't mean to be a landlord, you shouldn't be.  And, you need to seriously calculate the cost of a vacant home before you allow it to stay that way.

Besides, if you are moving out of that "starter" home as a move up buyer, or to relocate, then you are likely going to get the best end of both markets - seller's market conditions when selling, buyer's market conditions when buying.  What more could you ask for?  You would not have gotten that benefit in 2005. 

Looking at value rather than prices, it may very well be prudent for you to consider making your move now, while interest rates are lower and buyers have buying power, while inventory is low and buyers have little choice and are paying premiums and competiting not just on price but on terms.

Remember, most homeowners who thought, in 2007, thought their 2005 values would have returned by now.  It hasn't, and it's cost them money - a lot of money - over the past two years.  They have seen their dreams shattered and finances ruined by trying to time the market.  Don't make the same mistake

Here's an example of someone who's in denial over market conditions - it's a bit humorous, but after reading this blog and watching the video, look in the mirror.  You're not doing the same thing, are you?
http://therealestatewhisperer.blogspot.com/2009/08/in-economies-like-ours-its-hard-to-know.html


============

My advice here is NOT one size fits all. 
For a personal consultation in the Northern Virginia/Dulles area, please contact me at:

703-669-3142

for more news from the front lines of real estate!

Thursday, September 3, 2009

The Long and Short of a Short Sale, Part 4

Continuing our posts on short sales, this post discusses the most common clauses in the contract, and how you, as a buyer or seller, should attempt to negotiate the clauses.  (Please keep in mind you need an attorney or a real estate agent, or both, to advise you personally.  I am talking here in very general terms.)

All real estate contracts have contingencies in them on both sides.  A contingency is the "if" in these statements:
I will sell you this house IF ______________.
I will buy your house IF ________________.
Contingencies can be for anything you can dream up.  However, most residential contract contingencies fall into a handful of categories.
Sellers Contingencies:
To protect the seller, the primary contingencies revolve around money and the settlement date.  The seller says "I will sell you the house IF you give me $___________ by__________(date)".  If the buyers don't bring the money to closing, or don't show up, the sellers can terminate the contract without penalty  (although there may be a penalty to the buyers). 

In a short sale situation, sellers should also have a contingency for "Third Party Approval" - meaning they need to get approval from their lender(s) to be able to sell the property, since the proceeds will not cover the mortgage.  If the sellers can not obtain the approval, then they can terminate the contract without penalty.
Buyers Contigencies:
To protect the buyer, contingencies almost always include: (a) financing (if they can't get a loan, they can't buy the house); (b) appraisal (if an appraiser doesn't certify that they are paying market value-or less-for the property, then they won't buy the property); (c) the dates, particularly the date of settlement; and finally (c) that the buyer needs to be getting the deed to the property, free and clear, with all rights and enjoyments of ownership (in Virginia, this is called a General Warranty Deed).  In addition, we often see buyers ask for a contingency to do a home inspection and/or environmental testing on the property; and, if the property falls in an area that has a Property Owners Association, then Virginia provides the right to buyers to receive and review a package full of information about the restrictions and fees associated with that POA.  In a short sale situation, we may also see language built into a contract that allows the buyers to terminate the contract because the "short sale approval" hasn't been received within a certain time frame. 


To improve chances of a short sale, sellers want a contract that has no buyer contingencies. 
To provide the maximum protection and lowest risks, buyers want maximum contingencies.

If I am representing a seller:

  • PRICE: I want a contract price that represents at least full market value; and in general, I want the highest price possible to entice the bank to approve the sale, and also because in some cases, sellers are being asked to pay the deficit between the mortgage payoff and the proceeds of the sale.  The higher the proceeds of the sale, the less my client would be liable for.


  • FINANCING: I will attempt to obtain a cash contract, with no inspection or appraisal contingencies for the buyer.  If that is not possible, I will want a full loan commitment, with the only contingencies being seller contingencies.


  • DEPOSIT: I want a high earnest money deposit, and I want it to be deposited into the escrow account as in a normal contract.


  • SHORT SALE APPROVAL: I want the longest possible timeframe to get the short sale approved.


  • PROPERTY OWNER DOCUMENTS: Since this contingency can not be waived by the buyers, I want any POA documents delivered to the buyer early on, with an addendum that they will pay the cost to replace them if they terminate the contract and do not return them.

If I am representing a buyer:

  • PRICE: I want a contract price that reflects no more than the market value in "as is" property condition...preferrably with a financial  benefit to my client because they are having to deal with the uncertainties and frustrations of a short sale.  (Generally, if the bank orders a BPO/Appraisal of their own, and the contract price is within 10% of the fair market value, then they will accept it; of course, I hope my buyer will be paying at least 10% less than fair market value).


  • DEADLINES: I want a full home inspection and financing and appraisal contingencies, and I don't want my buyer paying any of those "hard costs" (out of pocket) until we've gotten the approval from the seller's lender (which is the thing that takes the longest in this process).


  • DEPOSIT: I want the "consideration" for the contract to be in the form of a Note Payable, rather than actual funds, until the seller's bank has approved the sale.  This is because EVEN if my buyer defaults, their money is still in their own pocket - and the seller will have to sue them to get the deposit.  Most sellers in this situation will not take court action to obtain cash from a buyer that didn't buy the house.  However, if my buyer DOES NOT default, but has made a hard money deposit into an escrow account, and the buyer choses to exercise a right of walking away from the contract under one of the contingencies, then my buyer may have to fight the seller - perhaps even in court - to get their money back.


  • SHORT SALE APPROVAL: I want a short timeframe to get the short sale approved, in an effort to increase the speed of each action on the other side of the transaction.


  • OUT CLAUSE: I want an addendum that says my buyer can serve a UNILATERAL notice to the seller that he is terminating the contract FOR ANY REASON, up until the time that the short sale approval is received.  This is so that my buyer can continue looking for other homes while he waits for the approval on this short sale.  That way, if it is not approved, the buyer didn't miss out on anything (interest rates, pricing, market supply) while he waited.  (Please note this is not part of any standard addendum in our region... and many agents will wrongfully tell you it is implied.  Again, your agent matters. Read what you sign - regardless of what your agent says, the written agreement dictates the enforceable terms.)

In this post, I sound a bit like a 2 year old, I want what I want....and I do put up a good fight if it seems reasonable.  However, in the game of real estate it is not about getting all of what you want, it is about getting enough of what you want and all of what you need; and about balancing the needs and wants of the primary parties. 

Balancing the two sides is where an experienced agent with good negotiation skills comes into play.  But, sometimes you simply don't know how good your agent is until it is too late.   So, in my next post, I will share examples of things I have seen, failures and successes.  These examples will help you know how to balance your interests.

I invite you to read the earlier posts in this series.  Start with this post:  A Short Sale, Anything But Short.  Then, stay tuned to The Real Estate Whisperer for important real estate news from the front lines...Get your news AS the market is changing!

***

It probably goes without saying, but, if you are thinking of buying or selling in Northern Virginia, I hope you'll call ME first to see if I can assist you. Also, no matter where you are in the country, feel free to contact me. While I can not give real estate advice outside of Virginia, I can connect you with a proven professional in your area. I belong to many networks, including REO and short sale expert networks, and we have members throughout the country.


I can be reached at:
703-669-3142

Sunday, August 30, 2009

The Long and Short of a Short Sale, Part 3

Continuing our posts on short sales, this post focuses on how different situations can impact your chances of success with a short sale.  Below, I've outlined highlights of the ingredients which improve your chances of having a successful short sale.

A true hardship

If you had a true hardship which is impacting your ability to pay for your mortgage, and you provide evidence to back that up, banks have a strong reason to consider your request for a short sale.  

Banking is big business and they are under a lot of scrutiny right now; policy (i.e. politics), and the perception thereof = credibility to their share holders and financial backers; and consequently impacts their bottom line.  In other words, banks look better when they are helping people with a true sob story, a true hardship that any of us can imagine happening in our lives or the lives of others we know.  So, yes, in some ways, banks are being judgemental about your situation.  Don't let your pride get in the way when writing your hardship letter. Tell them why you need their help.  They are more likely to give it to you.

You have no other reasonable alternatives

In your hardship letter, you should spell out what alternatives you have considered (and ruled out) and what still exist, and, do it with strength.  It increases incentives to the bank for considering your request.  For example, if they can show (and you remind them) that you attempted to get a loan modification but didn't qualify, then they know you've TRIED to find alternatives.  If you've depleated savings and credit lines (and you demonstrate that), they realize you've TRIED to handle the problem on your own, but were unsuccessful.  If you're considering bankruptsy, they realize you consider yourself destitute with few options. 

Your letter should always state that you are looking for the best alternative for all involved, and you believe that is the short sale.  A foreclosure is not good for you or the lender.

For some banks, if you continue to pay your mortgage payment, they will believe that some how, some way, you will continue to stay current; and therefore, they may not consider your request, or it may be prioritized very low in the stack of requests.  Banks, too, go through a state of denial.
In all cases, expect your financial records to be required (in detail).  They will do their own calculations to determine if you CAN continue to pay. It's your job to show them you can not.  You are not asking for a small favor here; so don't expect it to be easy. 

Lower numbers of approval layers = Higher chances of success

For every bank/lender involved, another approval is required.  The more approvals required, the more the complicated and time consuming the process gets; and consequently, each approval required reduces the chance of success.  If any ONE party denies the request, the short sale will not go through.

If you have only one lender and one loan, the process is fairly easy.    If you have multiple loans with one bank, it's also a reasonable transaction to try to accomplish. 

If there are two different lenders on two different loans, you must get approvals from both; and it gets tricky.  For example, let's say you own a house worth $250,000 today, but you bought it in 2005 for $375,000 with what we called an 80/20 split - meaning you had one loan for 80% of the value ($300,000), and another loan for 20% of the value ($75,000).  Again, if both loans are through the same bank, it's not too hard; but if there are two banks, they will argue over how the proceeds get split.
 
In a foreclosure, the primary lien holder (the one with the $300K loan) would get the full proceeds of the sale - approximately $225K after closing costs; which translates to something like $215K after having to incur the costs for foreclosing, too.  (There are HUGE variables depending on banks and states here, so please understand this is only an approximate example.) The secondary lien holder will get nothing. 
 
In a short sale, the only reason a second lender would even consider approving a short sale is for a reward of some sort.  Fairly commonly, we see that the second lender will accept $5K as full payoff for the $75K loan.  Remember that it costs them money to process the sale, and so they are really not getting much at all for this.  That means they take their time approving (or not) the sale. 
 
The other thing is that the primary lender - the one that would get $215K of the $300K you owe them (of the $600K they thought they were going to get if you paid it over 30 years) - is being forced to face a painful situation, and they do NOT want to share another $5K with the second bank.  But, they might....after all, do they have a better alternative?
 
As you can easily see, however, the higher the number is that the second bank requires, the less likely the first bank is to agree to split to split the proceeds.  At some point, it makes more financial sense for the primary lender to allow the property to go through foreclosure.
 
If you add 3 or more loans with different lenders to the equation, everything can very easily can fall apart.
 
Most consumers have no idea that very often, they are paying (for example) Countrywide (now Bank of America) every month but another lender or institution is actually the mortgage holder, and BofA only services the loan (handles collections, escrows, paperwork and customer service).  When there is a servicer and investor, you must work through the servicer but the investor must approve the short sale.  While this generally does not deter chances of approval (it depends on who the investor is), it will often increase the length of time required to process a short sale.  The longer it takes, the more challenging it can be to keep buyers on the other end.  At some point, their patience may wear out.  No buyer, no sale.
 
If you have some kind of mortgage insurance on your loan, the insurance policy can impact your ability to get a short sale approved.  If the bank is not taking "enough" of a hit on the short sale, it may not qualify to collect on the insurance; and it may be better for them to foreclose on the property so they get foreclosure proceeds plus the insurance payout.  We're seeing this affect less short sales, but it can be a "behind the scenes" factor.  Part of the reason it is not impacting us too much today is that we were rarely doing FHA or VA loans or even those with private mortgage insurance in 2004-2006; at least in the Washington DC market. And, those homeowners are the ones that are being most impacted by the recent decline in home values.  When combined with a personal hardship, these homeowners make up the majority of the short sale candidates in our market.

Timing

Some parts of "timing" you don't choose.  You don't know the lenders internal climate, and what their current business policy is for dealing with short sales - and this changes often based on market and political influences; and it can impact your sale.

What you CAN choose is when to ask for professional help.  Get your real estate agent involved before you have missed a payment.  This gives your agent the most amount of time to help you examine your options and then to start the process moving along if short sale is the best strategy.

Make sure that once the ball starts rolling, everything happens as quickly as possibly.  Have your financial package ready, so that once you have a ratified contract, you can submit the package to the bank immediately without delay.
Also, in cases where there are multiple lenders, make sure you submit packages to all of them at the same time, or the earliest time at which you can deliver a complete package.  Do not get approval from one lender first, and then submit for approval from the second lender.  Your multiple banks can work concurrently on processing their packages.
Your agent(s):  The "Professional Negotiator"

Some people immediately reach out to a "professional" negotiator.  Many of these negotiators are asking for very high (non-refundable) fees upfront, and additional success fees.  I am not a fan of these companies, although some are reasonable and work WITH your real estate agent to assist you. 

I see these companies as extensions of the real estate agent.  Instead of hiring additional administrative assistants to handle all the paperwork, emails and phone calls, the agent is choosing to hire an outside company with specialized experience in the area of short sales.  However, some agents are hiring these companies because they are intimidated by the process of negotiating with your bank.  Any real estate agent afraid of negotiating is not an agent I would want to hire. 

So, if a third party company is involved, do your research and make sure you understand their role and your agent's role.  Usually, these companies require some fee upfront - if you have a complicated case, then a fee may be reasonable (not thousands of dollars).  Any success fees, since they are working as an extension of the listing agent, should be incurred by that agent, and guarranteed by the owner (my opinion). 

NOTE:  Some states are not allowing agents to negotiate short sales on behalf of their clients; they are requiring attorneys and/or third party negotiators.  In these cases, it makes sense that the agents would pass along those fees to the clients.

Your agent(s):  The Real Estate Agent

To me, the most critical decision an owner makes during this process is what real estate agent to hire.  Your agent will be guiding you through the process from start to finish.  You want to make sure your agent knows how.  Do they understand the process?  Do they have good communication skills (written and spoken mastery of the English language)?  Good follow up skills?  Do you know what the process is and who will be doing what for you? 
Remember, your agent must negotiate with the bank, facilitate a lot of financial paperwork exchange, market and advertise your property for sale, negotiate on your behalf with the showing agents and their clients; and coordinate the transaction all the way through to the closing.  It's a TOUGH job; hire carefully.

The right marketing and good price negotiation

You will need to demonstrate the marketing plan used to procure an offer.  Walking across the street to the neighbor's house and asking what they are willing to pay for the house is not going to suffice.  You must show that you listed the home, usually with a real estate agent who placed it in the multiple listing service (not all areas have these, believe it or not).  You must show that you did all the typical stuff - internet advertising, signage, etc. and that you attempted to make the availability of the home known to the widest possible audience in an attempt to procure the best offer possible.
You must also demonstrate why you used the asking price you did - with comps and market data... not because just about anyone will buy just about anything if it is cheap enough.  You can not ask $100K for your $250K house and then expect the bank to accept an offer at that price. 
In a continuing declining market (by the way, this is no longer the case in our area), you might have run comps that supported a $240K-260K price point, so you listed it at $235K to try to get a quick offer.  After 2 weeks, you dropped the price to $225K, still nothing.  Now, you're 30 days into this and there have been no new sales in your market place in that 30 days and no body seems that interested.  You get an offer of $175K. 

Well, here's what I'd do - I'd drop the asking price to $175K and wait a few days - maybe a week, to see if I can get that offer from anyone else.  Hopefully, you'll get an offer at $200K, maybe $215K, and then you can ratify and send it to the bank.  If not, I'd ratify the $175K offer and submit it.  You can then show that you TRIED to get a better offer or multiple offers at that point, and you couldn't.  It demonstrates that the price is not below, or at least not far below true market value.

The right buyer

Selecting a buyer who understands the short sale process is important.  If the buyer MUST move within 60 days, and you haven't started the process with your bank, that is not going to work. 
Selecting a well qualified buyer is critical.  Make sure that the buyer has the funds available to close, and that they are in an FDIC insured account (not the stock market).  Make sure the pre-approval letter is from a well respected loan officer and from lender (not a mortgage broker) and is current.  If the process takes several months, your agent should be checking in with the lender to make sure the loan program remains available and that the buyer (to the best of his/her knowledge) is still qualified.

The right offer

If you're in a fairly active market, your agent should market your price agressively, but not ridiculously, in order to obtain a quick offer - hopefully many.  The lesser contingencies the better. The buyer will want some protection in the contract - it is only reasonable.  But, as the seller, negotiate as much as you can in your favor.  Make sure the buyer understands - even if they do a home inspection - the property is being sold as is, and the homeowner will make no repairs (after all, this is a financial crisis, and the buyer is getting a great deal).

If you are "approvable" based on the bank criteria, the price is the make or break it point of the short sale contract.  While everyone knows that short sales, from a buyers perspective, SHOULD be good deals, it can not be much below what the bank's appraisers show is fair market value for the home.  If you sent in an offer of $100K on your $250K home, the banks generally won't accept it.  Remember, most are taking public bail out funds, and almost all have public share holders or atleast multiple financial backers.  Even if they WANT to, they can not take ridiculous offers... their financial backers would walk, the public would scream.  It simply isn't possible.  (Keep in mind here that I am not referencing a list price, but market value.)

When it falls apart

With so many variables, often sales fall apart on the buyer's side.  Maybe the buyer can't wait any longer, or their financial situation changed, or you simply picked the wrong offer because the buyers agent can't manage her clients' expectations, or maybe the bank counters with a higher price and the buyer chooses not to accept it.  Whatever the reasons, buyers often walk.  But, the first contract is critical because it starts the ball rolling with the lender.  If your contract falls apart, I discourage you from telling the bank this information, because they will stop their process.  Just get a new contract; and try to collect the earnest money for your clients.

Maybe you had back up contracts, or maybe just other offers - call them back.  Maybe they are still interested?

If you've gotten bank approval when the contract falls apart, getting the second offer should be easier - once you put the house back on the market, and you can show potential buyers the terms that the bank agreed to, it means most of the waiting is over.  If you replace the contract quickly enough, perhaps you won't even need to get reapproval (depends on how the approval was issued by the lender).  Even if you are required to get re-approval, try hard to match the terms and conditions and make the contract as strong as possible.  From a buyer standpoint, putting an offer on an "approved" short sale takes much of the guessing and waiting out of the process, and makes your home a very attractive alternative.
BOTTOM LINE:  By working with a qualified professional who understands the various nuances involved in these types of sales, your chances of success are dramatically increased.  I've done my best to outline for you the major considerations.  I hope you will use these to interview agents.  Make sure they can expand on these items, and explain which are mostly likely to impact you.

STAY TUNED FOR MY NEXT POST WHICH WILL OUTLINE THE VARIOUS TERMS OF CONTRACTS AND CONSIDERATIONS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE TRANSACTION.

***

Of course, if you own a home in Northern Virginia, I hope you'll call ME first to see if I can assist you.  Also, no matter where you are in the country, feel free to contact me.  While I can not give real estate advise outside of Virginia, I can connect you with a proven professional in your area.  I belong to many networks, including REO and short sale expert networks, and we have members throughout the country.
I can be reached at:
703-669-3142

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

The Long and Short of a Short Sale, Part 2

Since the homeowner is the one who initiates the short sale process, let's look in more detail at the selling side.

In this post, I will talk about who should and should not consider a short sale; and WHEN they should take action.

Why consider a short sale? Anyone who thinks they may end up allowing a home to go into foreclosure should seriously consider this option.

  • CREDIT: With a short sale, your credit is damaged, but not nearly as badly as it would be if the home went into foreclosure.
  • LIVING SITUATION: With a short sale, you are not evicted (like you could be if your home was foreclosed), and you look like a better prospective tenant to future landlords if your credit shows a short sale, rather than a foreclosure and eviction, on your record.
  • PRIDE: You are cutting your losses and controlling the damage....making the best of an otherwise uncomfortable situation. Your neighbors and co-workers probably already know you owe more than your house is worth - so do they... but you're showing them that you are the kind of person that works with everyone involved to find a satisfactory resolution; that you are responsible.
  • SECURITY CLEARANCES/JOB REQUIREMENTS: Especially true in the Washington DC Market, many people have security clearances required for their jobs. In these cases, foreclosures can be very difficult to explain, and short sales are are considered much more favorably, especially when they are coupled with a true hardship (see below). Foreclosures can put your current or future job options in jeopardy.
  • DEBT FORGIVENESS/AVOID BANKRUPTSY: In most cases, you can negotiate debt forgiveness as part of the package; and therefore, do not have to worry later about collection activities, which otherwise could force you into bankruptsy to protect the assets you do have.

Why should an owner NOT consider a short sale?

  • NOT ENOUGH TIME/LENDER WON'T AGREE: If any of lenders advises the owner that there is not time before the foreclosure, or that for other reasons they will not work with the owner in a short sale process (this is increasingly rare, but it happens).
  • TOO COSTLY: If the homeowner has so many layers of liens and mortgages against the property that professionals are telling you that it is not likely to be approved and/or they will only attempt it with a large, non refundable deposit or fee. (Small non-refundable fees are reasonable, especially if your case is a complicated one. A small fee is a couple hundred dollars - not thousands.)
  • DON'T NEED TO: When the owner CAN continue to make payments as agreed for the duration of the loan; even if it is uncomfortable. Or, when the owner would prefer a loan modification and the lender has indicated a willingness to work with the owner for a loan modification.

A short sale should be the last alternative to a foreclosure, not a knee jerk reaction to falling real estate values and overleveraged homes. With each short sale request, the lender will require a "hardship letter". This is a letter that explains why you, as the homeowner, have a hardship and why they, as the lender, should work with you and forgive part of your debt.

Hardships include:

  • Involuntary job loss or unexpected loss of substantial income that prevents you from making payments or from making the full payment.
  • Involuntary change in family situation due to death, divorce or other unexpected changes, like becoming the Octo-mom.
  • Involuntary relocation (i.e. military relocation).
  • Medical situation/disability that either results in a decrease of income, and significant increase of expenses, or the need to move elsewhere, or a combination of these things.
  • You could never afford the mortgage in the first place, and you can show that by the continual use of your savings (which is rapidly declining or depleated) and credit lines (which are rapidly increasing or maxed out) to pay the mortgage.

What is NOT a hardship:

  • You pulled all the equity out of your home to purchase another piece of real estate which you still own, free and clear from any liens or mortgages. (Cure: sell that second property and pay down your current mortgage; or sell the primary property and take a mortgage on the second property to pay the deficit on the first property.)
  • You like going out to dinner every night and shopping at the best stores and that makes it hard to pay your mortgage...besides mom said you can live with her for free.
  • You don't really want to work anymore.
  • The value of your property declined, like everyone else's, and you don't think you should have to suffer that loss.

While it is true that in some (non-recourse) states, like Nevada, you may still get a short sale approved even if you do not have a hardship.... most of the time, banks are looking for your sob story here. Give it to them.

When do you throw in the towel?

Going through this process is very difficult emotionally. Let's face it, when you started this journey, you had a very different outcome in mind. This was to be your home; or the investment that was going to solve your future financial woes. Now, those dreams are not being realized and you're suffering a very real financial loss and that goes hand and hand with emotional loss.... not to mention that this hardship is generally because of another hardship (like job loss or divorce). Given that, you are likely to go through all five stages of grief:

  • Denial (we can do this);
  • Anger (if the real estate agent/lender/spouse/child/etc. hadn't...fill in the blank.... I wouldn't be in this situation);
  • Bargaining (maybe if we...);
  • Depression (it's hopeless);
  • Acceptance (OK, let's move on).

You should call the a real estate agent and perhaps an attorney or financial advisor when you are in the "bargaining" stage, assuming (at that time) that you are still current on your mortgage. That's when we can help you examine options. Talk to consultants that you trust, who have your best interest at heart and who are not charging you for their advice at this stage of the game. Be wary of their interests - if they get paid only if you do one thing, expect them to want you to do that one thing; especially if they are pushing you very hard rather than trying to help you. For example, respect a real estate agent who asks you if you've attempted to have your loan modified so you can stay in the home.

DEFINATELY call a real estate agent no later than when you realize you can not make the next mortgage payment. The further behind you are in your payments the harder it is to have a successful short sale, and you may have eliminated other options at that time, too.

******

In the next posts, we'll talk more about the selling side - about what the ingredients are for a successful short sale, and about about the role of the real estate agent, attorney or third party negotiator in the short sale process. Then, we'll talk about the buying side, and what risks buyers have and the countermeasures they should take to reduce risks. Stay tuned!

If you are wondering if you should consider a short sale, call me. I am happy to provide a free consultation any time.

Vicky Chrisner, Keller Williams Realty

Ofc: 703-669-3142

Email: VChrisner@KW.com

www.VickyChrisner.com

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Update on the Market: Washington DC Area (VA/MD/WV/DC)

Delta Associates is a well respected authority within the housing market, but their reports are rarely public, until now. MRIS (The Metropolitan Regional Information System), which is the local multiple listing service, now offers reports to the public through their web site each quarter. The video below explains how to view some of the information, offering highlights from the 2nd quarter reports for 2009. The Washington DC metropolitan area includes Northern Virginia, most of Maryland, and the panhandle of West Virginia, and (of course) DC.
For more specific information or assistance interpretting what this data means to you - as a potential home buyer, home seller, renter or property owner - please don't hesitate to contact me. I am happy to be a resource for you!
 
Clicky Web Analytics